Geoptie vs Goodie: Which AI Search Platform Should You Choose in 2026?

Quick Summary
Geoptie and Goodie are both AI search optimization platforms. Goodie positions itself as an enterprise "AEO" platform starting at $495/mo with 11+ AI model coverage. Geoptie starts at $49/mo with Content Studio and Technical Audit Reports.
Choose Geoptie if:
You want affordable pricing ($49/mo) with audit reports and content tools.
Choose Goodie if:
You have budget for premium pricing ($495+/mo) and need 11+ AI models.
Goodie has positioned itself as a pioneer in "AEO" (Answer Engine Optimization), with founders who created a Maven course on the topic. Trusted by brands like Chime, SteelSeries, Jabra, and ByteDance, Goodie offers one of the widest AI model coverages in the market.
Let's compare Goodie's enterprise-focused approach with Geoptie's transparent, self-serve platform to help you decide which is right for your team.
The Key Difference: Enterprise vs Self-Serve
The fundamental difference comes down to target audience and pricing model.
Goodie is a premium AEO platform with impressive AI model coverage: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, AI Overview, AI Mode, Grok, Rufus (Amazon), Meta AI, and Microsoft Copilot. Their Pro plan starts at $495/mo (annual) and includes 30K responses analyzed, 500K citations, Agentic AEO, and AEO Content Writer. Team and Enterprise plans require custom quotes.
Geoptie starts at $49/mo—10x more affordable than Goodie's entry point. While it covers fewer AI models, it includes Content Studio and Technical Audit Reports that help you act on visibility insights immediately. You can start a 14-day free trial today without sales calls.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Geoptie | Goodie |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT Tracking | ||
| Perplexity Tracking | ||
| Google AI Overviews | ||
| Claude Tracking | ||
| Gemini Tracking | ||
| DeepSeek / Grok / Meta AI | ||
| Amazon Rufus | ||
| Content Studio / Writer | ||
| Technical Audit Reports | ||
| Transparent Pricing |
What Goodie Does Well
Goodie has earned trust from major enterprise brands with several standout features:
- Widest AI model coverage — 11+ models including Grok, Rufus, Meta AI, DeepSeek
- AEO pioneers — Created Maven course and "Bible" on Answer Engine Optimization
- Enterprise clients — Trusted by Chime, SteelSeries, Jabra, ByteDance
- Agentic Commerce — Specialized optimizer for AI shopping experiences
- Traffic Attribution — Measure actual traffic from AI search sources
For enterprise brands that need coverage across emerging AI platforms like Amazon Rufus, Grok, or Meta AI—and have budget for custom enterprise pricing—Goodie offers comprehensive coverage.
Pricing Comparison
Goodie's Pro plan starts at $495/mo (annual) or $645/mo (quarterly)—significantly higher than Geoptie's pricing. Team and Enterprise plans require custom quotes.
| Plan | Geoptie | Goodie |
|---|---|---|
| Starter / Pro | $49/mo 15 prompts, 2 brands | $495/mo 30K responses, 3 seats |
| Professional / Team | $99/mo 100 prompts, 10 brands | Custom 75K responses, 12 seats |
| Enterprise | $199/mo 400 prompts, 50 brands | Custom Unlimited everything |
Geoptie Includes
- Starting at $49/mo
- Technical Audit Reports
- Content Studio (all plans)
- 14-day free trial
Goodie Pro Includes
- 30K responses analyzed/mo
- 500K citations analyzed
- Agentic AEO
- AEO Content Writer
Key insight: Goodie's entry-level Pro plan ($495/mo) costs 10x more than Geoptie's Starter plan ($49/mo). Goodie targets enterprise teams with budget for premium AI coverage, while Geoptie is accessible to startups, SMBs, and agencies.
Who Should Use Which Platform?
Choose Geoptie if you're:
- A startup or SMB wanting to start without sales calls
- Need transparent, predictable pricing
- Want Technical Audit Reports alongside visibility tracking
- Focused on the major AI engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity)
Choose Goodie if you're:
- An enterprise brand with budget for custom solutions
- Need coverage of 11+ AI models including Rufus, Grok, Meta AI
- Want Traffic Attribution to measure AI search impact
- Prefer working with a dedicated enterprise sales team
The Bottom Line
Goodie is an impressive enterprise platform with the widest AI model coverage in the market. If you need to track visibility across Grok, Amazon Rufus, Meta AI, and DeepSeek alongside the major players, Goodie is one of the few options that covers them all.
However, if you want to start today without sales calls, Geoptie offers transparent pricing starting at $49/mo with a 14-day free trial. While it covers fewer AI models, it includes Technical Audit Reports that help identify what's blocking your visibility—something Goodie doesn't offer.
Ready to improve your AI visibility?
Start with a free GEO audit to see where your brand stands in AI search results.
Get Your Free AuditFrequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Geoptie and Goodie?
The main difference is pricing and AI model coverage. Goodie starts at $495/mo with 11+ AI models including Grok, Rufus, and Meta AI. Geoptie starts at $49/mo with Technical Audit Reports and Content Studio, but covers fewer AI models.
Is Geoptie a good Goodie alternative?
Yes, Geoptie is an excellent Goodie alternative if Goodie's $495/mo starting price is too high for your budget. Geoptie starts at $49/mo and includes Technical Audit Reports that Goodie doesn't offer.
How much does Goodie cost?
Goodie's Pro plan costs $495/mo (annual) or $645/mo (quarterly). It includes 30K responses analyzed, 500K citations, 2 countries, 3 seats, and AEO Content Writer. Team and Enterprise plans require custom quotes.
Which platform covers more AI models?
Goodie covers 11+ AI models including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, Grok, Amazon Rufus, Meta AI, and Microsoft Copilot. Geoptie focuses on the major engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews.
What is AEO vs GEO?
AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) refer to the same concept—optimizing content for AI search engines. Goodie uses the term AEO, while most of the industry uses GEO. Both focus on improving visibility in AI-generated responses.
